THE EFFECT OF VIRTUAL LABORATORY WORK IN GEOMETRICAL OPTICS CLASSES ON THE INTEREST AND ATTITUDES OF ACADEMIC LYCEUM STUDENTS
PDF
DOI

Keywords

virtual laboratory
geometric optics
Interest
pedagogical observation
questionnaire survey
comparative analysis
statistics

How to Cite

Makhmudov , F. (2026). THE EFFECT OF VIRTUAL LABORATORY WORK IN GEOMETRICAL OPTICS CLASSES ON THE INTEREST AND ATTITUDES OF ACADEMIC LYCEUM STUDENTS. Journal of Pedagogical and Psychological Studies, 4(1), 18–24. Retrieved from https://imfaktor.com/jopaps/article/view/2042

Abstract

The lack of optical equipment in many academic lyceums, limited laboratory infrastructure, stringent safety requirements, and the inability to conduct real experiments under distance learning conditions create a need to integrate virtual laboratories into the educational process. This article examines the interest of academic lyceum students in virtual laboratory activities developed for geometric optics lessons. During the study, experimental and control groups were formed, and students’ level of interest was assessed using a questionnaire based on a five-point Likert scale. The collected data were analyzed using statistical methods. The results demonstrated that students in the experimental group who used virtual laboratory activities showed a higher level of interest (mean score – 4.54), whereas the control group displayed a relatively moderate level of interest (mean score – 3.54). The findings indicate that integrating virtual laboratories into optics education is an effective pedagogical approach for improving students’ understanding of the subject, enhancing their practical skills, and increasing their motivation toward learning physics.

PDF
DOI

References

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2020-yil 5-oktyabrdagi PF–6079-son “Raqamli O‘zbekiston – 2030” strategiyasini tasdiqlash va uni samarali amalga oshirish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida gi Farmoni. – https://lex.uz/search/all?actnum=6079&lang=3

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2019-yil 8-oktyabrdagi PF–5847-son “O‘zbekiston Respublikasi oliy ta’lim tizimini 2030-yilgacha rivojlantirish konsepsiyasini tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida” gi Farmoni. – https://lex.uz/uz/search/all?searchtitle=o%CA%BBzbekiston%20respublikasi%20oliy%20ta%CA%BClim%20tizimini%202030

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2021-yil 19-martdagi PQ–5032-son “Fizika sohasidagi ta’lim sifatini oshirish va ilmiy tadqiqotlarni rivojlantirish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida” gi qarori. – Toshkent, 2021. // Qonun hujjatlari ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi, 19.03.2021., 07/21/5032/0226-son. https://lex.uz/docs/5338558

Goeser P.T., Hamza-Lup F.G., Johnson W.M., Scharfer D. VIEW: A virtual interactive web-based learning environment for engineering. // Advances in Engineering Education. 2011. Vol. 2. P. 1–24.

Balamuralithara B., Woods P.C. Virtual laboratories in engineering education: The simulation lab and remote lab. // Computer Applications in Engineering Education. 2009. Vol. 17. P. 108–118.

Huang H.M., Liaw S.S., Lai C.M. Exploring learner acceptance of the use of virtual reality in medical education: A case study of desktop and projection-based display systems. // Interactive Learning Environments. 2016. Vol. 24. P. 3–19.

Syed Z.A., Trabookis Z., Bertrand J.W., Madathil K.C., Hartley R.S., Frady K.K., Wagner J.R., Gramopadhye A.K. Evaluation of virtual reality based learning materials as a supplement to the undergraduate mechanical engineering laboratory experience. // International Journal of Engineering Education. 2019. Vol. 35. P. 842–852.

Vega-Hernández M.C., Patiño-Alonso M.C., Galindo-Villardón M.P. Multivariate characterization of university students using ICT for learning. // Computers & Education. 2018. Vol. 121. P. 124–130.

Huang H.F., Lee C.F. Factors affecting usability of 3D model learning in a virtual reality environment. // Interactive Learning Environments. 2021.

Caroline B.M., Buhangin J.F., Angalan N.Q. Review of Industry 4.0 competencies and virtual learning environment in engineering education. // International Journal of Engineering Education. 2020. Vol. 36. P. 40–47.

Dickinson K.J., Gronseth S.L. Application of universal design for learning principles to surgical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. // Journal of Surgical Education. 2020. Vol. 77. P. 1008–1012.

El Kharki K. Virtual laboratories in physics education. 2021.

EJSS and Moodle integration for interactive physics laboratories. 2021.

EXPERES Project: 12 Universities, 12 Virtual Experiments. 2021.

Kolodii V. et al. Inquiry-Based Learning in traditional physics classrooms. 2025.

Analysis of virtual laboratory platforms: PhET, Labster, VLabs, eScience Labs, Molecular Workbench, Simulab.

Menchafou Y. Effectiveness of VLABs in Moroccan schools. 2024.

STEM digital tools for online physics laboratories. 2022.

Akçayır G., Akçayır M. A systematic review of virtual classrooms in Web of Science. 2018.

PhET integration for conceptual understanding in physics education.

Effects of virtual laboratories on students’ motivation and academic achievement.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.